Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Journal articles |
规范类型 | 论文 |
DOI | 10.1038/s41559-020-01295-x |
Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them | |
Neal Haddaway; Biljana Macura | |
发表日期 | 2020-11-02 |
出版年 | 2020 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This article aims to identify major pitfalls in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews, making use of recent examples from across the field. |
摘要 | Systemic reviews have been introduced as a more rigorous approach to synthesizing evidence, compared to traditional approaches, but their methods are often poorly applied. Using examples, this article aims to identify major pitfalls in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. |
标签 | evidence synthesis |
URL | https://www.sei.org/publications/eight-problems-with-literature-reviews-and-how-to-fix-them/ |
来源智库 | Stockholm Environment Institute (Sweden) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/525463 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Neal Haddaway,Biljana Macura. Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them. 2020. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Neal Haddaway]的文章 |
[Biljana Macura]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Neal Haddaway]的文章 |
[Biljana Macura]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Neal Haddaway]的文章 |
[Biljana Macura]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。