| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP193 |
| DP193 Hegemonic Stability Theories of the International Monetary System | |
| [unavailable] | |
| 发表日期 | 1987-09-01 |
| 出版年 | 1987 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Specialists in international relations have argued that international regimes operate smoothly and exhibit stability only when dominated by a single, exceptionally powerful national economy. In particular, this "theory of hegemonic stability" has been applied to the international monetary system. The maintenance of the Bretton Woods System for a quarter of a century up to 1972 is ascribed to the singular power of the United States in the postwar world, while the persistence of the classical gold standard is similarly ascribed to Britain's dominance of 19th-century financial markets. In contrast, the instability of the interwar gold-exchange standard is attributed to the absence of a hegemonic power. This paper assesses the applicability of hegemonic stability theory to international monetary relations, approaching the question from both theoretical and empirical vantage points. Theory is of some help in understanding the relatively smooth operation of the classical gold standard and the early Bretton Woods System as well as some of the difficulties of the interwar years. Much of the evidence, however, proves to be difficult to reconcile with the hegemonic stability interpretation. |
| 主题 | International Macroeconomics |
| 关键词 | Bretton woods Gold standard Hegemonic stability Hegemony International monetary relations International regimes |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp193 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/529349 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | [unavailable]. DP193 Hegemonic Stability Theories of the International Monetary System. 1987. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [[unavailable]]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [[unavailable]]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [[unavailable]]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
