G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP1712
DP1712 Job Tenure and Labour Market Regulation: A Comparison of Britain and Italy using Micro Data
Simon Burgess; Hedley Rees; Lia Pacelli
发表日期1997-10-31
出版年1997
语种英语
摘要In this paper we re-examine poverty among working class households in inter-war London using the newly computerized records from the New Survey of London Life and Labour (NSLLL), a survey of living standards in London undertaken in 1929?31. First, we examine how the use of different poverty lines affects the number of households found to be in poverty. We then analyse the effects of the inter-war social security system in relieving poverty. Finally, we estimate what difference it would have made to the extent and incidence of poverty if the post-Beveridge social security system had been in place during the inter-war period. Our main conclusions are that the inter-war social security system had played a greater role in averting poverty than it has sometimes been given credit for, even though substantial poverty remained. The post-Beveridge social security system, if applied in the inter-war period, would have reduced poverty still further, but would not have eliminated it.
关键词Interwar britain Poverty Social security Welfare state
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp1712
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/530855
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Simon Burgess,Hedley Rees,Lia Pacelli. DP1712 Job Tenure and Labour Market Regulation: A Comparison of Britain and Italy using Micro Data. 1997.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Simon Burgess]的文章
[Hedley Rees]的文章
[Lia Pacelli]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Simon Burgess]的文章
[Hedley Rees]的文章
[Lia Pacelli]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Simon Burgess]的文章
[Hedley Rees]的文章
[Lia Pacelli]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。