| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP3764 |
| DP3764 Which International Institutions Promote International Trade? | |
| Andrew Rose | |
| 发表日期 | 2003-01-23 |
| 出版年 | 2003 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | While the liberalization of trade has been at the forefront of the global agenda for many decades, the movement of natural persons remains heavily guarded. Nevertheless, restrictions on the movement of natural persons across regions impose a cost on developing and developed economies that far exceeds that of trade restrictions on goods. This Paper uses a global CGE model to investigate the extent of these costs, by examining the effects of an increase in developed countries? quotas on both skilled and unskilled temporary labour equivalent to 3% of their labour forces. The results confirm that restrictions on the movement of natural persons impose significant costs on nearly all countries (over $150 billion in all), and that those on unskilled labour are more burdensome than those on skilled labour. |
| 主题 | International Trade and Regional Economics |
| 关键词 | Gats mode 4 Temporary migration Cge |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp3764 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/532703 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Andrew Rose. DP3764 Which International Institutions Promote International Trade?. 2003. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Andrew Rose]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Andrew Rose]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Andrew Rose]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
