| 来源类型 | Discussion paper
|
| 规范类型 | 论文
|
| 来源ID | DP5053
|
| DP5053 Inattentive Consumers |
| [unavailable]
|
| 发表日期 | 2005-05-23
|
| 出版年 | 2005
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | India was a major player in the world export market for textiles in the early 18th century, but by the middle of the 19th century it had lost all of its export market and much of its domestic market. Other local industries also suffered some decline, and India underwent secular de-industrialization as a consequence. While India produced about 25% of world industrial output in 1750, this figure fell to only 2% by 1900. We use an open, specific-factor model to organize our thinking about the relative role played by domestic and foreign forces in India?s de-industrialization. The construction of new relative price evidence is central to our analysis. We document trends in the ratio of export to import prices (the external terms of trade) from 1800 to 1913, and that of tradable to non-tradable goods and own-wages in the tradable sectors going back to 1765. With this new relative price evidence in hand, we ask how much of the de-industrialization was due to local supply-side influences (such as the demise of the Mughal empire) and how much to world price shocks (such as world market integration and rapid productivity advance in European manufacturing), both of which had to deal with an offset ? the huge net transfer from India to Britain before 1815. Whether the Indian de-industrialization shocks and responses were big or small is then assessed by comparisons with other parts of the periphery. |
| 主题 | International Trade and Regional Economics
|
| 关键词 | De-industrialization
Price shocks
Globalization
India
18th and 19th century
|
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp5053
|
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/533950
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
[unavailable]. DP5053 Inattentive Consumers. 2005.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
