| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP5140 |
| DP5140 Work and Leisure in the US and Europe: Why So Different? | |
| Alberto Alesina; Edward Glaeser; Bruce Sacerdote | |
| 发表日期 | 2005-07-23 |
| 出版年 | 2005 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Because of concern that OECD tariff reductions will translate into worsening export performance for the least developed countries, trade preferences have proven a stumbling block to developing country support for multilateral liberalization. We examine the actual scope for preference erosion, including an econometric assessment of the actual utilization, and also the scope for erosion estimated by modeling full elimination of OECD tariffs and hence full MFN liberalization-based preference erosion. Preferences are underutilized due to administrative burden ? estimated to be at least 4% on average ? reducing the magnitude of erosion costs significantly. For those products where preferences are used (are of value), the primary negative impact follows from erosion of EU preferences. This suggests the erosion problem is primarily bilateral rather than a WTO-based concern. |
| 主题 | International Trade and Regional Economics |
| 关键词 | Preference erosion Gsp Wto Doha round Trade Development |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp5140 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/534026 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Alberto Alesina,Edward Glaeser,Bruce Sacerdote. DP5140 Work and Leisure in the US and Europe: Why So Different?. 2005. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
