G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP5768
DP5768 Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive Theory
Tore Ellingsen; Magnus Johannesson
发表日期2006-07-30
出版年2006
语种英语
摘要Theoretical IO models of horizontal mergers and acquisitions make the critical assumption of efficiency gains. Without efficiency gains, these models predict either that mergers are not profitable or that mergers are welfare reducing. A problem here is the empirical observation that on average mergers do not create efficiency gains. We analyze mergers in a model where firms cannot equalize marginal costs and marginal revenues over all dimensions in their action space due to constraints. In this type of model mergers can still be profitable and welfare enhancing while they create a loss in efficiency. The merger allows a firm to relax constraints. Further, this set up is consistent with the following stylized facts on mergers and acquisitions: M\&A's happen when new opportunities have opened up or industries have become more competitive (due to liberalization), they happen in waves, shareholders of the acquired firms gain while shareholders of the acquiring firms lose from the acquisition. Standard IO merger models do not explain these empirical observations.
主题Industrial Organization
关键词Pro/anti-competitive mergers Efficiency defence Constraints Merger waves Deregulation
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp5768
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/534609
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tore Ellingsen,Magnus Johannesson. DP5768 Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive Theory. 2006.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tore Ellingsen]的文章
[Magnus Johannesson]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tore Ellingsen]的文章
[Magnus Johannesson]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tore Ellingsen]的文章
[Magnus Johannesson]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。