| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP6270 |
| DP6270 Comparing Subjective and Objective Measures of Health: Evidence from Hypertension for the Income/Health Gradient | |
| Carol Propper; Michael Shields; David W Johnston | |
| 发表日期 | 2007-04-30 |
| 出版年 | 2007 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | We develop a model that clarifies the respective advantages and disadvantages of academic and private-sector research. Rather than relying on lack of appropriability or spillovers to generate a rationale for academic research, we emphasize control-rights considerations, and argue that the fundamental tradeoff between academia and the private sector is one of creative control versus focus. By serving as a precommitment mechanism that allows scientists to freely pursue their own interests, academia can be indispensable for early-stage research. At the same time, the private sector's ability to direct scientists towards higher-payoff activities makes it more attractive for later-stage research. |
| 主题 | Industrial Organization |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp6270 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/535104 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Carol Propper,Michael Shields,David W Johnston. DP6270 Comparing Subjective and Objective Measures of Health: Evidence from Hypertension for the Income/Health Gradient. 2007. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
