Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP7492 |
DP7492 What do Russians think about transition? | |
Irina Denisova; Ekaterina Zhuravskaya; Markus Eller | |
发表日期 | 2009-10-11 |
出版年 | 2009 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may present further evidence. The parties may misrepresent evidence in their favor at a cost. At equilibrium the two parties never testify together. When the evidence is much in favor of one party, this party testifies. When the evidence is close to the prior mean, no party testifies. We compare this outcome under a purely adversarial procedure with the outcome under a purely inquisitorial procedure (Emons and Fluet 2009). We provide sufficient conditions on when one procedure is better than the other one. |
主题 | Industrial Organization |
关键词 | Adversarial Costly state falsification Evidence production Inquisitorial Procedure |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp7492 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/536329 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Irina Denisova,Ekaterina Zhuravskaya,Markus Eller. DP7492 What do Russians think about transition?. 2009. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。