G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP7537
DP7537 How much nominal rigidity is there in the US Economy? Testing a New Keynesian DSGE model using indirect inference
Patrick Minford; Michael R. Wickens; Vo Phuong Mai Le
发表日期2009-11-08
出版年2009
语种英语
摘要We provide a simple but novel model of trade agreements that highlights the role of transaction costs, renegotiation and dispute settlement. The model allows us to characterize the appropriate remedy for breach and whether the agreement should be structured as a system of "property rights" or "liability rules." We then study how the optimal rules depend on the underlying economic and contracting environment. Our model also delivers predictions about the outcome of trade disputes, and in particular about the propensity of countries to settle early versus "fighting it out."
主题International Trade and Regional Economics
关键词Breach remedies Dispute settlement International trade agreements
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp7537
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/536373
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Patrick Minford,Michael R. Wickens,Vo Phuong Mai Le. DP7537 How much nominal rigidity is there in the US Economy? Testing a New Keynesian DSGE model using indirect inference. 2009.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Patrick Minford]的文章
[Michael R. Wickens]的文章
[Vo Phuong Mai Le]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Patrick Minford]的文章
[Michael R. Wickens]的文章
[Vo Phuong Mai Le]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Patrick Minford]的文章
[Michael R. Wickens]的文章
[Vo Phuong Mai Le]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。