| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP9119 |
| DP9119 Protectionism during the crisis: Tit-for-tat or chicken games? | |
| Marcelo Olarreaga; Mauro Boffa | |
| 发表日期 | 2012-09-02 |
| 出版年 | 2012 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | During the recent financial crisis many countries resorted to protectionist measures to try to boost demand for domestically-produced goods. In this paper we explore the extent to which the adoption of protectionist measures led to retaliation by other countries undermining the increase in demand. We found no evidence of retaliation. On the contrary, there is strong evidence of chicken-games being played. Indeed, the probability of a protectionist measure being imposed on a trading partner's export bundle is significantly smaller when the partner imposes a protectionist measure on home exports. |
| 主题 | International Trade and Regional Economics |
| 关键词 | Chicken-games Financial crisis Trade retaliation |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp9119 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/537952 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Marcelo Olarreaga,Mauro Boffa. DP9119 Protectionism during the crisis: Tit-for-tat or chicken games?. 2012. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Marcelo Olarreaga]的文章 |
| [Mauro Boffa]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Marcelo Olarreaga]的文章 |
| [Mauro Boffa]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Marcelo Olarreaga]的文章 |
| [Mauro Boffa]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
