G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP9280
DP9280 The New Stylized Facts About Income and Subjective Well-Being
Justin Wolfers; Betsey Stevenson; Dan Sacks
发表日期2013-01-13
出版年2013
语种英语
摘要In recent decades economists have turned their attention to data that asks people how happy or satisfied they are with their lives. Much of the early research concluded that the role of income in determining well-being was limited, and that only income relative to others was related to well-being. In this paper, we review the evidence to assess the importance of absolute and relative income in determining well-being. Our research suggests that absolute income plays a major role in determining well-being and that national comparisons offer little evidence to support theories of relative income. We find that well-being rises with income, whether we compare people in a single country and year, whether we look across countries, or whether we look at economic growth for a given country. Through these comparisons we show that richer people report higher well-being than poorer people; that people in richer countries, on average, experience greater well-being than people in poorer countries; and that economic growth and growth in well-being are clearly related. Moreover, the data show no evidence for a satiation point above which income and well-being are no longer related.
主题Development Economics ; Labour Economics ; Public Economics
关键词adaptation Easterlin paradox Economic growth Life satisfaction Quality of life Subjective well-being
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp9280
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/538116
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Justin Wolfers,Betsey Stevenson,Dan Sacks. DP9280 The New Stylized Facts About Income and Subjective Well-Being. 2013.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Justin Wolfers]的文章
[Betsey Stevenson]的文章
[Dan Sacks]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Justin Wolfers]的文章
[Betsey Stevenson]的文章
[Dan Sacks]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Justin Wolfers]的文章
[Betsey Stevenson]的文章
[Dan Sacks]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。