Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP9468 |
DP9468 Conflict Resolution, Public Goods and Patent Thickets | |
Dietmar Harhoff; Georg von Graevenitz; Stefan Wagner | |
发表日期 | 2013-05-12 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Post-grant validity challenges at patent offices rely on the private initiative of third parties to correct mistakes made by patent offices. We hypothesize that incentives to bring post-grant validity challenges are reduced when many firms benefit from revocation of a patent and when firms are caught up in patent thickets. Using data on opposition against patents at the European Patent Office we show that opposition decreases in fields in which many others profit from patent revocations. Moreover, in fields with a large number of mutually blocking patents the incidence of opposition is sharply reduced, particularly among large firms and firms that are caught up directly in patent thickets. These findings indicate that post-grant patent review may not constitute an effective correction device for erroneous patent grants in technologies affected by either patent thickets or highly dispersed patent ownership. |
主题 | Industrial Organization |
关键词 | Intellectual property Opposition Patent litigation Patent thickets Patents Post-grant review |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp9468 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/538303 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dietmar Harhoff,Georg von Graevenitz,Stefan Wagner. DP9468 Conflict Resolution, Public Goods and Patent Thickets. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。