| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP9724 |
| DP9724 Bibliometric Evaluation vs. Informed Peer Review: Evidence from Italy | |
| Tullio Jappelli; Franco Peracchi; Graziella Bertocchi; Alfonso Gambardella; Carmela A Nappi | |
| 发表日期 | 2013-11-10 |
| 出版年 | 2013 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | A relevant question for the organization of large scale research assessments is whether bibliometric evaluation and informed peer review where reviewers know where the work was published, yield similar results. It would suggest, for instance, that less costly bibliometric evaluation might - at least partly - replace informed peer review, or that bibliometric evaluation could reliably monitor research in between assessment exercises. We draw on our experience of evaluating Italian research in Economics, Business and Statistics, where almost 12,000 publications dated 2004-2010 were assessed. A random sample from the available population of journal articles shows that informed peer review and bibliometric analysis produce similar evaluations of the same set of papers. Whether because of independent convergence in assessment, or the influence of bibliometric information on the community of reviewers, the implication for the organization of these exercises is that these two approaches are substitutes. |
| 主题 | Public Economics |
| 关键词 | Bibliometric evaluation Peer review Research assessment Vqr |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp9724 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/538560 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Tullio Jappelli,Franco Peracchi,Graziella Bertocchi,et al. DP9724 Bibliometric Evaluation vs. Informed Peer Review: Evidence from Italy. 2013. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
