| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP9997 |
| DP9997 Under the Thumb of History? Political Institutions and the Scope for Action | |
| Abhijit Banerjee; Esther Duflo | |
| 发表日期 | 2014-06-01 |
| 出版年 | 2014 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | This paper discusses the two leading views of history and political institutions. For some scholars, institutions are mainly products of historical logic, while for others, accidents, leaders, and decisions have a significant impact. We argue that while there is clear evidence that history matters and has long-term effects, there is not enough data to help us distinguish between the two views. Faced with this uncertainty, what is a social scientist to do? We argue that given the possibility that policy decisions indeed make a difference, it makes sense to assume they do and to try to improve policymaking. |
| 主题 | Development Economics |
| 关键词 | Political economy Determinism |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp9997 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/538845 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Abhijit Banerjee,Esther Duflo. DP9997 Under the Thumb of History? Political Institutions and the Scope for Action. 2014. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Abhijit Banerjee]的文章 |
| [Esther Duflo]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Abhijit Banerjee]的文章 |
| [Esther Duflo]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Abhijit Banerjee]的文章 |
| [Esther Duflo]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
