| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP10233 |
| DP10233 Basic versus supplementary health insurance: the role of cost effectiveness and prevalence | |
| jan boone | |
| 发表日期 | 2014-11-02 |
| 出版年 | 2014 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | In a model where patients face budget constraints that make some treatments unaffordable, we ask which treatments should be covered by universal basic insurance and which by private voluntary insurance. We argue that both cost effectiveness and prevalence are important if the government wants to maximize the health gain that it gets from its health budget. In particular, basic insurance should cover treatments that are used by people who at the margin buy treatments that are highly cost effective. This is not the same as covering treatments that are themselves highly cost effective |
| 主题 | Industrial Organization ; Public Economics |
| 关键词 | Universal basic health insurance Voluntary supplementary insurance Public vs private insurance Access to care Cost effectiveness |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp10233 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/539066 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | jan boone. DP10233 Basic versus supplementary health insurance: the role of cost effectiveness and prevalence. 2014. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [jan boone]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [jan boone]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [jan boone]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
