G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP10632
DP10632 Does Product Familiarity Matter for Participation?
Michael Haliassos; Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln
发表日期2015-05-31
出版年2015
语种英语
摘要Household access to financial products is often conditioned on previous use. However, banning access when learning is possible may be discriminatory or counter-productive. The ?experiment? of German reunification (exogenously) offered to East Germans unconditional access to (exogenously) unfamiliar capitalist products. Controlling for characteristics, East Germans participated immediately, were as likely to use unfamiliar risky securities as West Germans, and more likely to use consumer debt, without signs of regret. Our results suggest that mistakes of unfamiliar households can be prevented by a knowledgeable and well-incentivized financial sector and by interaction with familiar peers. This implies that regulation should refocus on the financial sector rather than on prohibiting individuals to gain familiarity with financial products.
主题Financial Economics
关键词Stockholding Household debt Consumer credit Household finance Familiarity Regulation Investor protection Financial literacy
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp10632
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/539464
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michael Haliassos,Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln. DP10632 Does Product Familiarity Matter for Participation?. 2015.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michael Haliassos]的文章
[Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michael Haliassos]的文章
[Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michael Haliassos]的文章
[Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。