G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP10656
DP10656 The performance of school assignment mechanisms in practice
Hessel Oosterbeek; Pieter A. Gautier; Bas van der Klaauw; Monique de Haan
发表日期2015-06-14
出版年2015
语种英语
摘要Theory points to a potential trade-off between two main school assignment mechanisms; Boston and Deferred Acceptance (DA). While DA is strategy-proof and gives a stable matching, Boston might outperform DA in terms of ex-ante efficiency. We quantify the (dis)advantages of the mechanisms by using information about actual choices under Boston complemented with survey data eliciting students' school preferences. We find that under Boston around 8% of the students apply to another school than their most-preferred school. We compare allocations resulting from Boston with DA with single tie-breaking (one central lottery; DA-STB) and multiple tie-breaking (separate lottery per school; DA-MTB). DA-STB places more students in their top-n schools, for any n, than Boston and results in higher average welfare. We find a trade-off between DA-STB and DA-MTB. DA-STB places more students in their single most-preferred school than DA-MTB, but fewer in their top-n, for n >= 2. Finally, students from disadvantaged backgrounds benefit most from a switch from Boston to any of the DA mechanisms.
主题Public Economics
关键词School choice Boston mechanism Deferred acceptance mechanism Strategic behavior Ex-ante efficiency Ex-post efficiency
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp10656
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/539488
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hessel Oosterbeek,Pieter A. Gautier,Bas van der Klaauw,et al. DP10656 The performance of school assignment mechanisms in practice. 2015.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hessel Oosterbeek]的文章
[Pieter A. Gautier]的文章
[Bas van der Klaauw]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hessel Oosterbeek]的文章
[Pieter A. Gautier]的文章
[Bas van der Klaauw]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hessel Oosterbeek]的文章
[Pieter A. Gautier]的文章
[Bas van der Klaauw]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。