| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP10710 |
| DP10710 Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance | |
| Helmuth Cremer; Kerstin Roeder | |
| 发表日期 | 2015-07-12 |
| 出版年 | 2015 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | This paper studies the political economy of a basic income (BI) versus a means tested welfare scheme. We show in a very simple setting that if society votes on the type of system, its generosity as well as the ?severity? of means testing (if any), a BI system could only emerge in the political equilibrium under very strong and empirically implausible conditions. Instead, the political process leads to a means tested system. The necessity to draw political support does affect the design of the system, but it only implies that means testing becomes less severe so that benefits are extended also to the middle classes. However, a fully universal system is rejected by a majority. |
| 主题 | Public Economics |
| 关键词 | Basic income Means testing Political support |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp10710 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/539541 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Helmuth Cremer,Kerstin Roeder. DP10710 Means testing versus basic income: the (lack of) political support for a universal allowance. 2015. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Helmuth Cremer]的文章 |
| [Kerstin Roeder]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Helmuth Cremer]的文章 |
| [Kerstin Roeder]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Helmuth Cremer]的文章 |
| [Kerstin Roeder]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
