G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP11303
DP11303 The Choice of Valuation Techniques in Practice: Education versus Profession
Kjell Nyborg; Lilia Mukhlynina
发表日期2016-05-31
出版年2016
语种英语
摘要We use a survey approach to learn about valuation professionals’ choices and implementations of valuation techniques in practice. The survey design allows us to control for a respondent’s professional subgroup (e.g., consulting), education, experience, and valuation purpose characteristics. We find support for the “sociological hypothesis” that profession matters more than education; different professions have different valuation cultures. Other factors are less important. There are also many commonalities across respondents. Most use both multiples and DCF, but implement DCF in a way that almost turns it into a multiples exercise. Confusion reigns with respect to interest tax shields and the WACC. Higher educational levels do not reduce the confusion. Our overall findings matter because valuation professionals function as intermediaries in the capital allocation process. The relative unimportance of education raises questions about the role and benefit of higher level finance education.
主题Financial Economics
关键词Valuation Valuation cultures Sociological hypothesis Multiples Dcf Finance education
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp11303
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/540119
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kjell Nyborg,Lilia Mukhlynina. DP11303 The Choice of Valuation Techniques in Practice: Education versus Profession. 2016.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kjell Nyborg]的文章
[Lilia Mukhlynina]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kjell Nyborg]的文章
[Lilia Mukhlynina]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kjell Nyborg]的文章
[Lilia Mukhlynina]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。