Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP11303 |
DP11303 The Choice of Valuation Techniques in Practice: Education versus Profession | |
Kjell Nyborg; Lilia Mukhlynina | |
发表日期 | 2016-05-31 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We use a survey approach to learn about valuation professionals’ choices and implementations of valuation techniques in practice. The survey design allows us to control for a respondent’s professional subgroup (e.g., consulting), education, experience, and valuation purpose characteristics. We find support for the “sociological hypothesis” that profession matters more than education; different professions have different valuation cultures. Other factors are less important. There are also many commonalities across respondents. Most use both multiples and DCF, but implement DCF in a way that almost turns it into a multiples exercise. Confusion reigns with respect to interest tax shields and the WACC. Higher educational levels do not reduce the confusion. Our overall findings matter because valuation professionals function as intermediaries in the capital allocation process. The relative unimportance of education raises questions about the role and benefit of higher level finance education. |
主题 | Financial Economics |
关键词 | Valuation Valuation cultures Sociological hypothesis Multiples Dcf Finance education |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp11303 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/540119 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kjell Nyborg,Lilia Mukhlynina. DP11303 The Choice of Valuation Techniques in Practice: Education versus Profession. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Kjell Nyborg]的文章 |
[Lilia Mukhlynina]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Kjell Nyborg]的文章 |
[Lilia Mukhlynina]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Kjell Nyborg]的文章 |
[Lilia Mukhlynina]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。