G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP11793
DP11793 How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree
Monika Schnitzer; Martin Watzinger; Thomas Fackler; Markus Nagler
发表日期2017-01-18
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要We study the 1956 consent decree against the Bell System to investigate whether patents held by a dominant firm are harmful for innovation and if so, whether compulsory licensing can provide an effective remedy. The consent decree settled an antitrust lawsuit that charged Bell with having foreclosed the market for telecommunications equipment. The terms of the decree allowed Bell to remain a vertically integrated monopolist in the telecommunications industry, but as a remedy, Bell had to license all its existing patents royalty-free. Thus, the path-breaking technologies developed by the Bell Laboratories became freely available to all US companies. We show that in the first five years compulsory licensing increased follow-on innovation building on Bell patents by 17%. This effect is driven mainly by young and small companies. Yet, innovation increased only outside the telecommunications equipment industry. The lack of a positive innovation effect in the telecommunications industry suggests that market foreclosure impedes innovation and that compulsory licensing without structural remedies is ineffective in ending it. The increase of follow-on innovation by small and young companies is in line with the hypothesis that patents held by a dominant firm act as a barrier to entry for start-ups. We show that the removal of this barrier increased long-run U.S. innovation, corroborating historical accounts.
主题Industrial Organization
关键词Innovation Antitrust Intellectual property Compulsory licensing
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp11793
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/540606
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Monika Schnitzer,Martin Watzinger,Thomas Fackler,et al. DP11793 How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree. 2017.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Monika Schnitzer]的文章
[Martin Watzinger]的文章
[Thomas Fackler]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Monika Schnitzer]的文章
[Martin Watzinger]的文章
[Thomas Fackler]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Monika Schnitzer]的文章
[Martin Watzinger]的文章
[Thomas Fackler]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。