G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP12104
DP12104 Equity versus Bail-in Debt in Banking: An Agency Perspective
Javier Suarez; Caterina Mendicino; Kalin Nikolov
发表日期2017-06-19
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要We examine the optimal size and composition of banks' total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC). Optimal size is driven by the trade-off between providing liquidity services through deposits and minimizing deadweight default costs. Optimal composition (equity vs. bail-in debt) is driven by the relative importance of two incentive problems: risk shifting (mitigated by equity) and private benefit taking (mitigated by debt). Our quantitative results suggest that TLAC size in line with current regulation is appropriate. However, an important fraction of it should consist of bail-in debt because such buffer size makes the costs of risk-shifting relatively less important at the margin.
主题Financial Economics
关键词Bail-in debt Loss absorbing capacity Risk shifting Agency problems Bank regulation
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp12104
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/540916
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Javier Suarez,Caterina Mendicino,Kalin Nikolov. DP12104 Equity versus Bail-in Debt in Banking: An Agency Perspective. 2017.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Javier Suarez]的文章
[Caterina Mendicino]的文章
[Kalin Nikolov]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Javier Suarez]的文章
[Caterina Mendicino]的文章
[Kalin Nikolov]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Javier Suarez]的文章
[Caterina Mendicino]的文章
[Kalin Nikolov]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。