G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP12596
DP12596 Disagreement and Security Design
Martin Schmalz
发表日期2018-01-15
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要We study optimal security design when the issuer and market participants agree to disagree about the characteristics of the asset to be securitized. We show that pooling assets can be optimal because it mitigates the effects of disagreement between issuer and investors, whereas tranching a cash-flow stream allows the issuer to exploit disagreement between investors. Interestingly, pooling and tranching can be complements. The optimality of debt with or without call provisions can be derived as a special case. In a model with multiple financing rounds, convertible securities naturally emerge to finance highly skewed ventures.
主题Financial Economics
关键词Disagreement Security design Optimism Overconfidence Pooling Tranching Behavioral finance
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp12596
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/541407
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Martin Schmalz. DP12596 Disagreement and Security Design. 2018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Martin Schmalz]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Martin Schmalz]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Martin Schmalz]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。