G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP13420
DP13420 Blockchain Economics
Joseph Abadi; Markus Brunnermeier
发表日期2018-12-28
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要When is record-keeping better arranged through a blockchain than through a traditional centralized intermediary? The ideal qualities of any record-keeping system are (i) correctness, (ii) decentralization, and (iii) cost efficiency. We point out a \textit{blockchain trilemma}: no ledger can satisfy all three properties simultaneously. A centralized record-keeper extracts rents due to its monopoly on the ledger. Its franchise value dynamically incentivizes correct reporting. Blockchains drive down rents by allowing for free entry of record-keepers and portability of information to competing "forks.'' Blockchains must therefore provide static incentives for correctness through computationally expensive proof-of-work algorithms and permit record-keepers to roll back history in order to undo fraudulent reports. While blockchains can keep track of ownership transfers, enforcement of possession rights is often better complemented by centralized record-keeping.
主题Financial Economics ; Industrial Organization ; International Macroeconomics and Finance ; Monetary Economics and Fluctuations
关键词Blockchain economics Fintech Cryptocurrencies Digital currencies Distributed ledger technology
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp13420
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/542234
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Joseph Abadi,Markus Brunnermeier. DP13420 Blockchain Economics. 2018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Joseph Abadi]的文章
[Markus Brunnermeier]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Joseph Abadi]的文章
[Markus Brunnermeier]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Joseph Abadi]的文章
[Markus Brunnermeier]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。