Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP13641 |
DP13641 Regulating Cancellation Rights with Consumer Experimentation | |
Roman Inderst; Florian Hoffmann | |
发表日期 | 2019-04-02 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Embedding consumer experimentation with a product or service into a market environment, we find that unregulated contracts induce too few returns or cancellations, as they do not internalize a pecuniary externality on other firms in the market. Forcing firms to let consumers learn longer by imposing a commonly observed statutory minimum cancellation or refund period is socially efficient only when firms appropriate much of the market surplus, while it backfires otherwise. Interestingly, cancellation rights are a poor predictor of competition, as in the unregulated outcome firms grant particularly generous rights when competition is neither too low nor too high. |
主题 | Industrial Organization |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp13641 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/542500 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Roman Inderst,Florian Hoffmann. DP13641 Regulating Cancellation Rights with Consumer Experimentation. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。