Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP13618 |
DP13618 Hedge Fund Performance: Are Stylized Facts Sensitive to Which Database One Uses? | |
Juha Joenväärä; Mikko Kaupila; Robert Kosowski; Pekka Tolonen | |
发表日期 | 2019-04-08 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This paper proposes a novel database merging approach and re-examines the fundamental questions regarding hedge fund performance. Before drawing conclusions about fund performance, we form an aggregate database by exploiting all available information across and within seven commercial databases so that widest possible data coverage is obtained and the effect of data biases is mitigated. Average performance is significantly lower but more persistent when these conclusions are inferred from aggregate database than from some of the individual commercial databases. Although hedge funds deliver performance persistence, an average fund or industry as a whole do not deliver significant risk-adjusted net-of-fee returns while the gross-of-fee returns remain significantly positive. Consistent with previous literature, we find a significant association between fund-characteristics related to share restrictions as well as compensation structure and risk-adjusted returns. |
主题 | Financial Economics |
关键词 | Hedge fund performance Persistence Sample selection bias Managerial skill |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp13618-0 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/542516 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Juha Joenväärä,Mikko Kaupila,Robert Kosowski,et al. DP13618 Hedge Fund Performance: Are Stylized Facts Sensitive to Which Database One Uses?. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。