Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP13789 |
DP13789 Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral? | |
David Card; Stefano DellaVigna; Patricia Funk; Nagore Iriberri | |
发表日期 | 2019-06-10 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We study the role of gender in the evaluation of economic research using submissions to four leading journals. We find that referee gender has no effect on the relative assessment of female- versus male-authored papers, suggesting that any differential biases of male referees are negligible. To determine whether referees as a whole impose different standards for female authors, we compare citations for female and male-authored papers, holding constant referee evaluations and other characteristics. We find that female-authored papers receive about 25% more citations than observably similar male-authored papers. Editors largely follow the referees, resulting in a 6 percentage point lower probability of a revise and resubmit verdict for female- authored papers relative to a citation-maximizing benchmark. In their desk rejection decisions, editors treat female authors more favorably, though they still impose a higher bar than would be implied by citation-maximization. We find no differences in the informativeness of female versus male referees, or in the weight that editors place on the recommendations of female versus male referees. We also find no differences in editorial delays for female versus male-authored papers. |
主题 | Labour Economics |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp13789 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/542658 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | David Card,Stefano DellaVigna,Patricia Funk,et al. DP13789 Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。