G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP14365
DP14365 Does demand noise matter? Identification and implications
Kenza Benhima; Céline Poilly
发表日期2020-01-30
出版年2020
语种英语
摘要We assess the role of demand noise (excessive optimism or pessimism about demand) together with supply noise (excessive optimism or pessimism about supply). To do so, we propose a methodology to decompose business cycles into supply, demand, supply noise and demand noise shocks, using a structural vector autoregression model. Key to our identification of both supply noise and demand noise is the use of sign restrictions on survey expectation errors about output growth and about inflation. We show that demand-related noise shocks have a negative effect on output and contribute substantially to its fluctuations. Monetary policy and private information seem to play a key role in the transmission of demand noise shocks.
主题Monetary Economics and Fluctuations
关键词Business cycle Information friction Noise shock Svar with sign restrictions
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp14365
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/543258
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kenza Benhima,Céline Poilly. DP14365 Does demand noise matter? Identification and implications. 2020.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kenza Benhima]的文章
[Céline Poilly]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kenza Benhima]的文章
[Céline Poilly]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kenza Benhima]的文章
[Céline Poilly]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。