G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP15449
DP15449 Fifty Shades of QE: Comparing Findings of Central Bankers and Academics
Brian Fabo; Martina Jancokova; Elisabeth Kempf; Luboš Pástor
发表日期2020-11-12
出版年2020
语种英语
摘要We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and inflation. They also report QE effects on output that are more significant, both statistically and economically, and they use more positive language in the abstract. Central bank researchers who report larger QE effects on output experience more favorable career outcomes. A survey of central banks reveals substantial involvement of bank management in research production.
主题Financial Economics ; Monetary Economics and Fluctuations
关键词Economic research Central bank Quantitative easing Qe Career concerns
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp15449-1
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/544445
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Brian Fabo,Martina Jancokova,Elisabeth Kempf,et al. DP15449 Fifty Shades of QE: Comparing Findings of Central Bankers and Academics. 2020.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Brian Fabo]的文章
[Martina Jancokova]的文章
[Elisabeth Kempf]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Brian Fabo]的文章
[Martina Jancokova]的文章
[Elisabeth Kempf]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Brian Fabo]的文章
[Martina Jancokova]的文章
[Elisabeth Kempf]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。