Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP15716 |
DP15716 Self-Set Goals Are Effective Self-Regulation Tools -- Despite Goal Revision | |
Jonas P. Kaiser; Alexander K Koch; Julia Nafziger | |
发表日期 | 2021-01-25 |
出版年 | 2021 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We test in an experiment whether and why non-binding, self-set goals are effective even though individuals can easily revise such goals. Depending on the treatment, subjects either set a goal a few days before working on an online task or right at the start of the task. In the former case, they may or may not be explicitly asked to revise their goal at the start of the task. Consistent with the hypothesis that goals are self-regulation tools, we observe that goals set before the task are larger than goals set at the start of the task. And they are effective: Subjects work more when a goal was set a few days before the task than when it was set at the start of the task. Importantly, these results arise even though subjects revise their initial goals. They do so no matter whether goal revision is made explicit or not -- suggesting that goal revision is an important factor for goal non-achievement. |
主题 | Industrial Organization ; Public Economics |
关键词 | Self-control Present-biased preferences Goals Goal revision Commitment devices Real effort Online experiment |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp15716 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/544722 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jonas P. Kaiser,Alexander K Koch,Julia Nafziger. DP15716 Self-Set Goals Are Effective Self-Regulation Tools -- Despite Goal Revision. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。