G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP15716
DP15716 Self-Set Goals Are Effective Self-Regulation Tools -- Despite Goal Revision
Jonas P. Kaiser; Alexander K Koch; Julia Nafziger
发表日期2021-01-25
出版年2021
语种英语
摘要We test in an experiment whether and why non-binding, self-set goals are effective even though individuals can easily revise such goals. Depending on the treatment, subjects either set a goal a few days before working on an online task or right at the start of the task. In the former case, they may or may not be explicitly asked to revise their goal at the start of the task. Consistent with the hypothesis that goals are self-regulation tools, we observe that goals set before the task are larger than goals set at the start of the task. And they are effective: Subjects work more when a goal was set a few days before the task than when it was set at the start of the task. Importantly, these results arise even though subjects revise their initial goals. They do so no matter whether goal revision is made explicit or not -- suggesting that goal revision is an important factor for goal non-achievement.
主题Industrial Organization ; Public Economics
关键词Self-control Present-biased preferences Goals Goal revision Commitment devices Real effort Online experiment
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp15716
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/544722
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jonas P. Kaiser,Alexander K Koch,Julia Nafziger. DP15716 Self-Set Goals Are Effective Self-Regulation Tools -- Despite Goal Revision. 2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jonas P. Kaiser]的文章
[Alexander K Koch]的文章
[Julia Nafziger]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jonas P. Kaiser]的文章
[Alexander K Koch]的文章
[Julia Nafziger]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jonas P. Kaiser]的文章
[Alexander K Koch]的文章
[Julia Nafziger]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。