| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP15960 |
| DP15960 Enforcement of Labor Regulation and the Labor Market Effects of Trade: Evidence from Brazil | |
| None Ulyssea; Vladimir Ponczek | |
| 发表日期 | 2021-03-25 |
| 出版年 | 2021 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | How does enforcement of labor regulations shape the labor market effects of trade? Does the informal sector introduce greater de facto flexibility, reducing employment losses during bad times? To tackle these questions, we exploit local economic shocks generated by trade liberalization and variation in enforcement capacity across local labor markets in Brazil. In the aftermath of the trade opening, regions with stricter enforcement observed: (i) lower informality effects; (ii) larger losses in overall employment; and (iii) greater reductions in the number of formal plants. Regions with weaker enforcement observed opposite effects. All these effects are concentrated on low-skill workers. Our results indicate that greater de facto labor market flexibility introduced by informality allows both formal firms and low-skill workers to cope better with adverse labor market shocks. |
| 主题 | Development Economics ; International Trade and Regional Economics ; Labour Economics |
| 关键词 | Trade Informality Labor market flexibility |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp15960 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/544950 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | None Ulyssea,Vladimir Ponczek. DP15960 Enforcement of Labor Regulation and the Labor Market Effects of Trade: Evidence from Brazil. 2021. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [None Ulyssea]的文章 |
| [Vladimir Ponczek]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [None Ulyssea]的文章 |
| [Vladimir Ponczek]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [None Ulyssea]的文章 |
| [Vladimir Ponczek]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
