Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP16007 |
DP16007 The welfare cost of ignoring the beta | |
Christian Gollier | |
发表日期 | 2021-04-04 |
出版年 | 2021 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Because of risk aversion, any sensible investment valuation system should value less projects that contribute more to the aggregate risk, i.e., that have a larger income-elasticity of net benefits. In theory, this is done by adjusting discount rates to consumption betas. But in reality, for various reasons (Arrow-Lind and WACC fallacies, market failures), most public and private institutions and people use a discount rate that is rather insensitive to the risk profile of their investment projects. I show in this paper that the economic consequences of the implied misallocation of capital are dire. To do this, I calibrate a Lucas model in which the investment opportunity set contains a myriad of projects with different expected returns and risk profiles. The welfare loss of using a single discount rate is equivalent to a permanent reduction in consumption that lies somewhere between 15% and 45%, depending upon which familiar discounting system is used. Economists should devote more energy to support a reform of public discounting systems in favor of what has been advocated by the normative interpretation of modern asset pricing theories over the last four decades. |
主题 | Public Economics |
关键词 | Discounting Investment theory Asset pricing Carbon pricing Arrow-lind theorem Wacc fallacy Rare disasters Capital budgeting |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp16007 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/544990 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Christian Gollier. DP16007 The welfare cost of ignoring the beta. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Christian Gollier]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Christian Gollier]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Christian Gollier]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。