G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP16188
DP16188 Trustors’ disregard for trustees deciding intuitively or reflectively: three experiments on time constraints
Antonio Cabrales; Antonio M. Espin; Praveen Kujal; Stephen Rassenti
发表日期2021-05-25
出版年2021
语种英语
摘要Human decisions in the social domain are modulated by the interaction between intuitive and reflective processes. Requiring individuals to decide quickly or slowly triggers these processes and is thus likely to elicit different social behaviors. Meanwhile, time pressure has been associated with inefficiency in market settings and market regulation often requires individuals to delay their decisions via cooling-off periods. Yet, recent research suggests that people who make reflective decisions are met with distrust. If this extends to external time constraints, then forcing individuals to delay their decisions may be counterproductive in scenarios where trust considerations are important. In three Trust Game experiments (total n = 1,872), including within- and between-subjects designs, we test whether individuals trust more someone who is forced to respond quickly (intuitively) or slowly (reflectively). We find that trustors do not adjust their behavior (or their beliefs) to the trustee’s time conditions. This seems to be an appropriate response because time constraints do not affect trustees’ behavior, at least when the game decisions are binary (trust vs. don’t trust; reciprocate vs. don’t reciprocate) and therefore mistakes cannot explain choices. Thus, delayed decisions per se do not seem to elicit distrust.
主题Organizational Economics ; Public Economics
关键词Trust Trustworthiness beliefs Reflection Dual process Intuition
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp16188
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545160
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Antonio Cabrales,Antonio M. Espin,Praveen Kujal,等. DP16188 Trustors’ disregard for trustees deciding intuitively or reflectively: three experiments on time constraints. 2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Antonio Cabrales]的文章
[Antonio M. Espin]的文章
[Praveen Kujal]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Antonio Cabrales]的文章
[Antonio M. Espin]的文章
[Praveen Kujal]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Antonio Cabrales]的文章
[Antonio M. Espin]的文章
[Praveen Kujal]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。