G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP16282
DP16282 When Bonuses Backfire: Evidence from the Workplace
Dirk Sliwka; Timo Vogelsang; Jakob Alfitian
发表日期2021-06-21
出版年2021
语种英语
摘要Monetary incentives are widely used to align employees’ actions with the objectives of employers. We conduct a field experiment in a retail chain to evaluate whether an attendance bonus reduces employee absenteeism. The RCT assigned 346 apprentices for one year to either a monetary attendance bonus, a time-off bonus or a control group. We find that neither form of the bonus reduced absenteeism, but the monetary bonus increased absence by around 45%. This backfiring effect is persistent and driven by the most recently hired apprentices. Survey results reveal that the bonus shifted the perception of absenteeism as acceptable behavior.
主题Organizational Economics
关键词Compensation Monetary incentives Time-off incentive Absenteeism Crowding-out Field experiment
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp16282
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545248
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dirk Sliwka,Timo Vogelsang,Jakob Alfitian. DP16282 When Bonuses Backfire: Evidence from the Workplace. 2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dirk Sliwka]的文章
[Timo Vogelsang]的文章
[Jakob Alfitian]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dirk Sliwka]的文章
[Timo Vogelsang]的文章
[Jakob Alfitian]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dirk Sliwka]的文章
[Timo Vogelsang]的文章
[Jakob Alfitian]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。