Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP16282 |
DP16282 When Bonuses Backfire: Evidence from the Workplace | |
Dirk Sliwka; Timo Vogelsang; Jakob Alfitian | |
发表日期 | 2021-06-21 |
出版年 | 2021 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Monetary incentives are widely used to align employees’ actions with the objectives of employers. We conduct a field experiment in a retail chain to evaluate whether an attendance bonus reduces employee absenteeism. The RCT assigned 346 apprentices for one year to either a monetary attendance bonus, a time-off bonus or a control group. We find that neither form of the bonus reduced absenteeism, but the monetary bonus increased absence by around 45%. This backfiring effect is persistent and driven by the most recently hired apprentices. Survey results reveal that the bonus shifted the perception of absenteeism as acceptable behavior. |
主题 | Organizational Economics |
关键词 | Compensation Monetary incentives Time-off incentive Absenteeism Crowding-out Field experiment |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp16282 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545248 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dirk Sliwka,Timo Vogelsang,Jakob Alfitian. DP16282 When Bonuses Backfire: Evidence from the Workplace. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。