G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP16703
DP16703 AI-tocracy
Martin Beraja; Andrew Kao; David Yang; Noam Yuchtman
发表日期2021-11-08
出版年2021
语种英语
摘要Can frontier innovation be sustained under autocracy? We argue that innovation and autocracy can be mutually reinforcing when: (i) the new technology bolsters the autocrat’s power; and (ii) the autocrat’s demand for the technology stimulates further innovation in applications beyond those benefiting it directly. We test for such a mutually reinforcing relationship in the context of facial recognition AI in China. To do so, we gather comprehensive data on AI firms and government procurement contracts, as well as on social unrest across China during the last decade. We first show that autocrats benefit from AI: local unrest leads to greater government procurement of facial recognition AI, and increased AI procurement suppresses subsequent unrest. We then show that AI innovation benefits from autocrats’ suppression of unrest: the contracted AI firms innovate more both for the government and commercial markets. Taken together, these results suggest the possibility of sustained AI innovation under the Chinese regime: AI innovation entrenches the regime, and the regime’s investment in AI for political control stimulates further frontier innovation.
主题Development Economics ; Political Economy ; Public Economics
关键词Artificial intelligence Autocracy Innovation Data China Surveillance Political unrest
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp16703
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545639
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Martin Beraja,Andrew Kao,David Yang,et al. DP16703 AI-tocracy. 2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Martin Beraja]的文章
[Andrew Kao]的文章
[David Yang]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Martin Beraja]的文章
[Andrew Kao]的文章
[David Yang]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Martin Beraja]的文章
[Andrew Kao]的文章
[David Yang]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。