Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 论文 |
来源ID | DP16835 |
DP16835 Investment and Contagion Tradeoffs between Fair Value and Historical Cost Accounting | |
Viral Acharya; Saptarshi Mukherjee; Rangarajan K Sundaram | |
发表日期 | 2021-12-25 |
出版年 | 2021 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We examine the effects of fair-value accounting (FVA) and historical-cost accounting (HCA) regimes on the ex-ante financing of projects by external investors. We formulate a model highlighting the relative merits and demerits of each accounting regime, in particular the sub-optimal continuations under the HCA regime and contagion-induced sub-optimal liquidations under the FVA regime. We show that under homogeneous beliefs about future cash-flows, FVA regime is superior with greater ex-ante financing, even during periods of high market illiquidity, when the failure of some banks leads to adverse spillovers on surviving financial institutions. However, if disclosures under the FVA regime leads to distorted beliefs about future success probabilities, ex-ante financing may suffer under the FVA regime, and it may no longer be superior relative to the HCA regime. In this setting we also analyze the impact on ex-ante financing of (i) ex-post redemption gates, which restrict the extent of investor liquidation under stress, and (ii) government guarantees, which limit the spillovers ex post but may incentivize excessive risk-taking ex ante. |
主题 | Financial Economics |
关键词 | Mark to market Financial crises Redemption gates Government guarantees |
URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp16835 |
来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545760 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Viral Acharya,Saptarshi Mukherjee,Rangarajan K Sundaram. DP16835 Investment and Contagion Tradeoffs between Fair Value and Historical Cost Accounting. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。