| 来源类型 | Discussion paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| 来源ID | DP16935 |
| DP16935 Trump ended WTO dispute settlement. Trade remedies are needed to fix it. | |
| Chad Bown | |
| 发表日期 | 2022-01-20 |
| 出版年 | 2022 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Unhappy with the rulings of the WTO dispute settlement system, which disproportionately targeted US use of trade remedies, the United States ended the entire system in 2019. There are multiple hurdles to agreeing to new terms of trade remedy use and thus potentially restoring some form of binding dispute settlement. First, a change would affect access to policy flexibility by the now large number of users of trade remedies. Second, although China’s exports are the overwhelming target of trade remedies, exporters in other countries increasingly find themselves caught up in trade remedy actions linked to China. Third, critical differences posed by China’s economic model may call for new rules for trade remedies, but no consensus on those rules has emerged. Even some of the most promising reforms have practical limitations, create additional challenges, or may be politically unviable. |
| 主题 | International Trade and Regional Economics |
| 关键词 | Wto Dispute settlement Antidumping Countervailing duties Safeguards Us China |
| URL | https://cepr.org/publications/dp16935 |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545874 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chad Bown. DP16935 Trump ended WTO dispute settlement. Trade remedies are needed to fix it.. 2022. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Chad Bown]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Chad Bown]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Chad Bown]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
