G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP17232
DP17232 Supply or Demand? Policy Makers’ Confusion in the Presence of Hysteresis
Antonio Fatas; Sanjay Singh
发表日期2022-04-18
出版年2022
语种英语
摘要Policy makers need to separate between temporary demand-driven shocks and permanent shocks in order to design optimal aggregate demand policies. In this paper we study the case of a central bank that ignores the presence of hysteresis when identifying shocks. By assuming that all low-frequency output fluctuations are driven by permanent technology shocks, monetary policy is not aggressive enough in response to demand shocks. In addition, we show that errors in assessing the state of the economy can be self-perpetuating if seen through the lens of the mistaken views of the policy maker. We show that a central bank that mistakes a demand shock for a supply shock, will produce permanent effects on output through their suboptimal policies. Ex-post, the central bank will see an economy that resembles what they had forecast when designing their policies. The shock is indeed persistent and this persistence validates their assumption that the shock was a supply-driven one. The interaction between forecasts, policies and hysteresis creates the dynamics of self-perpetuating errors that is the focus of this paper.
主题Monetary Economics and Fluctuations
关键词Potential output Hysteresis Stabilization policy Business cycles
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp17232
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/546234
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Antonio Fatas,Sanjay Singh. DP17232 Supply or Demand? Policy Makers’ Confusion in the Presence of Hysteresis. 2022.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Antonio Fatas]的文章
[Sanjay Singh]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Antonio Fatas]的文章
[Sanjay Singh]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Antonio Fatas]的文章
[Sanjay Singh]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。