| 来源类型 | VoxEU Column |
| 规范类型 | 评论 |
| Have we solved 'too big to fail'? | |
| Andrew Haldane | |
| 发表日期 | 2013-01-17 |
| 出版年 | 2013 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | China is perennially accused of currency manipulation. Yet, this column argues that a weak currency value doesn’t necessarily reflect currency manipulation. China is a fast growing economy with strong financial frictions and a high saving rate, and such countries naturally have weak currencies. Instead of focussing on accusations of currency manipulation, it might be more helpful for economists to encourage policies that foster Chinese consumption, gradually leading the renminbi to an appreciating path. |
| 主题 | Exchange Rates |
| 关键词 | China Currency manipulation Currency wars |
| URL | https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/have-we-solved-too-big-fail |
| 来源智库 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/549971 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Andrew Haldane. Have we solved 'too big to fail'?. 2013. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Andrew Haldane]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Andrew Haldane]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Andrew Haldane]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
