G2TT
来源类型VoxEU Column
规范类型评论
Recent developments in the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures
Michele Lanotte; Pietro Tommasino
发表日期2018-02-05
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要The consensus among economic (but not maritime) historians that maritime technology was more or less stagnant for 300 years until iron steamships appeared in the mid-19th century is largely based on indirect measures, such as changes in the cost of shipping freight or the length of voyages. This column instead looks directly at how the speed of ships in different winds improved over time. The speed of British ships rose by around half between 1750 and 1830 (albeit from a low base) thanks to innovations like the copper plating of hulls and the move from wooden to iron joints and bolts.
正文

With its hundreds of square yards of canvas sails making it the most effective means of harnessing inorganic energy in the pre-industrial world, the sailing ship was an essential transportation technology in the western world until the mid-19th century. Given the strong incentives, both military and commercial, to improve the performance of such vessels, it may come as a surprise that the consensus among economic (but not maritime) historians since the work of Douglass North (1968) is that until iron steamships appeared in the mid-19th century, maritime technology was more or less stagnant for 300 years.

Previous efforts to measure technical progress at sea have been indirect, looking at things like changes in the cost of shipping freight or the length of voyages (Solar 2013). In a new paper we take a different approach, looking directly at how the speed of ships in different winds improved through time (Kelly and Ó Gráda 2018).

We can do this thanks to an ambitious, but abortive, climatological project called CLIWOC (Wheeler et al. 2006). This attempted to reconstruct oceanic climate conditions between 1750 and 1850 by collecting records from 280,000 log book entries from British, Dutch, and Spanish ships. These give daily information on the ship’s location, wind speed, and direction that allow us to estimate how fast a ship sailed on a given day.

Figure 1 plots the daily positions of ships of the British Royal Navy and East India Company for several decades before the Napoleonic Wars, showing the long loops taken by these vessels as they followed prevailing winds and currents. The slow speeds at the equator can be seen by the way that points bunch there, and also at the southern tip of Africa, as ships made the difficult eastern run around the Cape of Good Hope.

Figure 1 Daily positions of British ships

­

Figure 2 (estimated by a generalised random forest to allow for possibly non-linear interactions between year, position and wind conditions) shows how the speed of East India ships rose by around half between 1750 and 1830, apart from dips during wartime when they sailed in slower convoys. However, we can also see that these ships sailed slowly. Even by the 1820s in a moderate or fresh breeze – the usual summertime conditions in the north Atlantic – they could only manage 5 to 7 knots.

Figure 2 Sailing speed of East India Company ships at different wind forces

Royal Navy ships experienced similar improvements, unlike Dutch and Spanish vessel counterparts. In fact, Dutch ships crawled to the East Indies as slowly in 1790 as they had in 1600, with over 5% of passengers and crew still dying in the overcrowded conditions and tropical heat of a typical voyage.

What explains these substantial improvements in British ships? The jump in the 1780s is due to the copper plating of hulls which stopped fouling with weed and barnacles, and over the entire period there were continuous improvements in sails and rigging. A big contribution after 1790 came from the increasing use of iron joints and bolts instead of wooden ones (as well as replacing traditional stepped decks with flat ones fitted with watertight hatches) which made for structurally sounder ships that could safely set more sail, especially in stronger winds.

We also have records of how long it took Post Office packets to sail to and from New York. Although these ships were often treated by officers and crew as a cover for smuggling (and occasionally piracy), their performance did rise moderately through time. Things changed completely when private American packets appeared in the 1820s, and by 1840 packets could sail about 50% faster than in 1750. (Clippers sailed half as fast again – in 1854 the Champion of the Seas averaged 19 knots over a day, a record not broken for 130 years.)

For the last generation, the dominant view among economic historians has been that the Industrial Revolution of the late 18th century was anything but revolutionary, with innovation limited to the initially small sectors of cotton, iron, and steam, with other sectors mired in stasis. However, a growing literature now highlights how widespread progress occurred across the British economy in sectors as varied as pottery, steel, printing and paper-making, water-power, gas lighting, watches, machine tools, and, as we have seen here, shipping.

References

Kelly, M, and C Ó Gráda (2018), “Speed under Sail during the Early Industrial Revolution”, CEPR Discussion Paper 12576.

North, D C (1968), “Sources of Productivity Change in Ocean Shipping, 1600-1850”, Journal of Political Economy 76, 953–970.

Solar, P M (2013), “Opening to the East: Shipping between Europe and Asia, 1780-1830”, Journal of Economic History 73, 625–661.

Wheeler, D, R Garcia-Herrera, F B Koek, C Wilkinson, G P Können, M R Prieto, P D Jones, and R Casale (2006), "CLIWOC, Climatological database for the world’s oceans: 1750 to 1850", Brussels: European Commission.

主题Economic history ; Productivity and Innovation
关键词sail ships Industrial revolution Transport Technology
URLhttps://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/recent-developments-regulatory-treatment-sovereign-exposures
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/553295
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michele Lanotte,Pietro Tommasino. Recent developments in the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures. 2018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michele Lanotte]的文章
[Pietro Tommasino]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michele Lanotte]的文章
[Pietro Tommasino]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michele Lanotte]的文章
[Pietro Tommasino]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。