| 来源类型 | Working Paper
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | 10.3386/w4756
|
| 来源ID | Working Paper 4756
|
| Multifactor Models Do Not Explain Deviations from the CAPM |
| A. Craig MacKinlay
|
| 发表日期 | 1994-06-01
|
| 出版年 | 1994
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | A number of studies have presented evidence rejecting the validity of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This evidence has spawned research into possible explanations. These explanations can be divided into two main categories - the risk based alternatives and the nonrisk based alternatives. The risk based category includes multifactor asset pricing models developed under the assumptions of investor rationality and perfect capital markets. The nonrisk based category includes biases introduced in the empirical methodology, the existence of market frictions, or explanations arising from the presence of irrational investors. The distinction between the two categories is important for asset pricing applications such as estimation of the cost of capital. This paper proposes to distinguish between the two categories using ex ante analysis. A framework is developed showing that ex ante one should expect that CAPM deviations due to missing risk factors will be very difficult to statistically detect. In contrast, deviations resulting from nonrisk based sources will be easy to detect. Examination of empirical results leads to the conclusion that the risk based alternatives is not the whole story for the CAPM deviations. The implication of this conclusion is that the adoption of empirically developed multifactor asset pricing models may be premature. |
| 主题 | Financial Economics
; Portfolio Selection and Asset Pricing
|
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w4756
|
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/562160
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
A. Craig MacKinlay. Multifactor Models Do Not Explain Deviations from the CAPM. 1994.
|
|
文件名：
|
w4756.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
