Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w8304 |
来源ID | Working Paper 8304 |
How Often Are Propositions on the Effects of Customs Unions Theoretical Curiosa and When Should They Guide Policy? | |
Lisandro Abrego; Raymond Riezman; John Whalley | |
发表日期 | 2001-05-01 |
出版年 | 2001 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This paper uses computational techniques to assess whether or not various propositions that have been advanced as plausible in the literature on Customs Unions (or other regional trade agreements) may actually hold. The idea is to make probabilistic statements as to whether propositions of interest might hold, rather than to restrict assumptions so they unambiguously hold. Our aim is to blend theory and numerical simulation and go beyond the ambiguous analytically derived propositions that dominate the theoretical literature so as to assess the likelihood of propositions holding for particular model specifications. |
主题 | International Economics ; Trade |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w8304 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/565902 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lisandro Abrego,Raymond Riezman,John Whalley. How Often Are Propositions on the Effects of Customs Unions Theoretical Curiosa and When Should They Guide Policy?. 2001. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w8304.pdf(1717KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。