Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w8697 |
来源ID | Working Paper 8697 |
Is More Information Better? The Effects of 'Report Cards' on Health Care Providers | |
David Dranove; Daniel Kessler; Mark McClellan; Mark Satterthwaite | |
发表日期 | 2002-01-09 |
出版年 | 2002 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Health care report cards - public disclosure of patient health outcomes at the level of the individual physician and/or hospital - may address important informational asymmetries in markets for health care, but they may also give doctors and hospitals incentives to decline to treat more difficult, severely ill patients. Whether report cards are good for patients and for society depends on whether their financial and health benefits outweigh their costs in terms of the quantity, quality, and appropriateness of medical treatment that they induce. Using national data on Medicare patients at risk for cardiac surgery, we find that cardiac surgery report cards in New York and Pennsylvania led both to selection behavior by providers and to improved matching of patients with hospitals. On net, this led to higher levels of resource use and to worse health outcomes, particularly for sicker patients. We conclude that, at least in the short run, these report cards decreased patient and social welfare. |
主题 | Health, Education, and Welfare ; Health ; Industrial Organization ; Regulatory Economics |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w8697 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/566304 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | David Dranove,Daniel Kessler,Mark McClellan,et al. Is More Information Better? The Effects of 'Report Cards' on Health Care Providers. 2002. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w8697.pdf(414KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。