| 来源类型 | Working Paper
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | 10.3386/w9578
|
| 来源ID | Working Paper 9578
|
| Openness and Growth: What's the Empirical Relationship? |
| Robert E. Baldwin
|
| 发表日期 | 2003-03-24
|
| 出版年 | 2003
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | There is still disagreement among economists concerning how a country's international economic policies and its rate of economic growth interact, despite a number of multi-country case studies utilizing comparable analytical frameworks, numerous econometric studies using large cross-country data sets, and important theoretical advances in growth theory. This paper briefly surveys this literature and points out the main reasons for the disagreements. Particular attention is given to an important study by Francisco Rodriguez and Dani Rodrik (2001) criticizing the conclusion of a number of recent multi-country statistical studies that openness is associated with higher growth rates. Rodriguez and Rodrik show that openness simply in the sense of liberal trade policies seems to be no guarantee of faster growth. However, the conclusion of most researchers involved in either country studies or multi-country statistical tests that lower trade barriers in combination with a stable and non-discriminatory exchange-rate system, prudent monetary and fiscal policies and corruption-free administration of economic policies promote economic growth still seems to remain valid. |
| 主题 | International Economics
; Trade
|
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w9578
|
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/567201
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Robert E. Baldwin. Openness and Growth: What's the Empirical Relationship?. 2003.
|
|
文件名：
|
w9578.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
