Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w10222 |
来源ID | Working Paper 10222 |
Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees?: An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories | |
Paul Oyer; Scott Schaefer | |
发表日期 | 2004-01-12 |
出版年 | 2004 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Many firms issue stock options to all employees. We consider three potential economic justifications for this practice: providing incentives to employees, inducing employees to sort, and helping firms retain employees. We gather data on firms' stock option grants to middle managers from three distinct sources, and use two methods to assess which theories appear to explain observed granting behavior. First, we directly calibrate models of incentives, sorting and retention, and ask whether observed magnitudes of option grants are consistent with each potential explanation. Second, we conduct a cross-sectional regression analysis of firms' option-granting choices. We reject an incentives-based explanation for broad-based stock option plans, and conclude that sorting and retention explanations appear consistent with the data. |
主题 | Labor Economics ; Labor Compensation |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w10222 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/567850 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Paul Oyer,Scott Schaefer. Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees?: An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories. 2004. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w10222.pdf(421KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Paul Oyer]的文章 |
[Scott Schaefer]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Paul Oyer]的文章 |
[Scott Schaefer]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Paul Oyer]的文章 |
[Scott Schaefer]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。