| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w10546 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 10546 |
| Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law | |
| Stephen M. Maurer; Suzanne Scotchmer | |
| 发表日期 | 2004-06-14 |
| 出版年 | 2004 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | For over a century, courts and commentators have struggled to find principles that reconcile patent and antitrust law, especially as to patent licensing. We interpret case law and commentary to arrive at three unifying principles for acceptable terms of license. Profit neutrality' holds that patent rewards should not depend on the rightholder's ability to work the patent himself. Derived reward' holds that the patent holder's profits should be earned, if at all, from the social value created by the invention. Minimalism' holds that licensing contracts should not contain more restrictions than are necessary to achieve neutrality. We argue that these principles largely rationalize important decisions of the twentieth century. They also justify the Supreme Court's controversial General Electric decision, which holds that patentholders can set prices charged by their licensees. |
| 主题 | Other ; Law and Economics ; Industrial Organization ; Market Structure and Firm Performance |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w10546 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/568175 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stephen M. Maurer,Suzanne Scotchmer. Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law. 2004. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w10546.pdf（400KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
