G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w10875
来源IDWorking Paper 10875
Standing on Academic Shoulders: Measuring Scientific Influence in Universities
James D. Adams; J. Roger Clemmons; Paula E. Stephan
发表日期2004-11-01
出版年2004
语种英语
摘要This article measures scientific influence by means of citations to academic papers. The data source is the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI); the scientific institutions included are the top 110 U.S. research universities; the 12 main fields that classify the data cover nearly all of science; and the time period is 1981-1999. Altogether the database includes 2.4 million papers and 18.8 million citations. Thus the evidence underlying our findings accounts for much of the basic research conducted in the United States during the last quarter of the 20th century. This research in turn contributes a significant part of knowledge production in the U.S. during the same period.
The citation measure used is the citation probability, which equals actual citations divided by potential citations, and captures average utilization of cited literature by individual citing articles. The mean citation probability within fields is on the order of 10-5. Cross-field citation probabilities are one-tenth to one-hundredth as large, or 10-6 to 10-7. Citations between pairs of citing and cited fields are significant in less than one-fourth of the possible cases. It follows that citations are largely bounded by field, with corresponding implications for the limits of scientific influence.
Cross-field citation probabilities appear to be symmetric for mutually citing fields. Scientific influence is asymmetric within fields, and occurs primarily from top institutions to those less highly ranked. Still, there is significant reverse influence on higher-ranked schools. We also find that top institutions are more often cited by peer institutions than lower-ranked institutions are cited by their peers. Overall the results suggest that knowledge spillovers in basic science research are important, but are circumscribed by field and by intrinsic relevance. Perhaps the most important implication of the results are the limits that they seem to impose on the returns to scale in the knowledge production function for basic research, namely the proportion of available knowledge that spills over from one scientist to another.
主题Industrial Organization ; Nonprofits ; Development and Growth ; Innovation and R& ; D
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w10875
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/568508
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
James D. Adams,J. Roger Clemmons,Paula E. Stephan. Standing on Academic Shoulders: Measuring Scientific Influence in Universities. 2004.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
w10875.pdf(462KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[James D. Adams]的文章
[J. Roger Clemmons]的文章
[Paula E. Stephan]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[James D. Adams]的文章
[J. Roger Clemmons]的文章
[Paula E. Stephan]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[James D. Adams]的文章
[J. Roger Clemmons]的文章
[Paula E. Stephan]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: w10875.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。