| 来源类型 | Working Paper
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | 10.3386/w13190
|
| 来源ID | Working Paper 13190
|
| Wisdom and Creativity in Old Age: Lessons from the Impressionists |
| David W. Galenson
|
| 发表日期 | 2007-06-29
|
| 出版年 | 2007
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Psychologists have not considered wisdom and creativity to be closely associated. This reflects their failure to recognize that creativity is not exclusively the result of bold discoveries by young conceptual innovators. Important advances can equally be made by older, experimental innovators. Yet we have had no examination of why some experimental artists have remained creative much later in their lives than others. Considering the major artists who worked together during the first decade of Impressionism, this paper compares the attitudes and practices of two important experimental innovators who made significant contributions after the age of 50 with two of their colleagues whose creativity failed to persist past 50. Unlike Pissarro and Renoir, who reacted to adversity in mid-career by attempting to emulate the methods of conceptual artists, Cézanne and Monet adopted elements of other artists' approaches while maintaining their own experimental methods and goals. For both Cézanne and Monet, recognizing how they themselves learned was a key to turning experience into wisdom. Their greatness in old age appears to have been a product of their understanding that although the improvement in their art might be painstaking and slow, over long periods its cumulative effect could be very great. |
| 主题 | Labor Economics
|
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w13190
|
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/570859
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
David W. Galenson. Wisdom and Creativity in Old Age: Lessons from the Impressionists. 2007.
|
|
文件名：
|
w13190.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
