Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w13557 |
来源ID | Working Paper 13557 |
Transfers in Cash and In Kind: Theory Meets the Data | |
Janet Currie; Firouz Gahvari | |
发表日期 | 2007-10-26 |
出版年 | 2007 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We review theoretical explanations for in-kind transfers in light of the limited empirical evidence. After reviewing the traditional paternalistic arguments, we consider explanations based on imperfect information and self-targeting. We then discuss the large literature on in-kind programs as a way of improving the efficiency of the tax system and a range of other possible explanations including the "Samaritan's Dilemma", pecuniary effects, credit constraints, asymmetric information amongst agents, and political economy considerations. Our reading of the evidence suggests that paternalism and interdependent preferences are leading overall explanations for the existence of in-kind transfer programs, but that some of the other arguments may apply to specific cases. Political economy considerations must also be part of the story. |
主题 | Public Economics ; Public Goods ; National Fiscal Issues |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w13557 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/571232 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Janet Currie,Firouz Gahvari. Transfers in Cash and In Kind: Theory Meets the Data. 2007. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w13557.pdf(533KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Janet Currie]的文章 |
[Firouz Gahvari]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Janet Currie]的文章 |
[Firouz Gahvari]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Janet Currie]的文章 |
[Firouz Gahvari]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。