| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w13710 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 13710 |
| Did the Death of Distance Hurt Detroit and Help New York? | |
| Edward L. Glaeser; Giacomo A.M. Ponzetto | |
| 发表日期 | 2007-12-28 |
| 出版年 | 2007 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Urban proximity can reduce the costs of shipping goods and speed the flow of ideas. Improvements in communication technology might erode these advantages and allow people and firms to decentralize. However, improvements in transportation and communication technology can also increase the returns to new ideas, by allowing those ideas to be used throughout the world. This paper presents a model that illustrates these two rival effects that technological progress can have on cities. We then present some evidence suggesting that the model can help us to understand why the past thirty-five years have been kind to idea-producing places, like New York and Boston, and devastating to goods-producing cities, like Cleveland and Detroit. |
| 主题 | Regional and Urban Economics |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w13710 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/571386 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Edward L. Glaeser,Giacomo A.M. Ponzetto. Did the Death of Distance Hurt Detroit and Help New York?. 2007. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w13710.pdf（300KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
